Peter Wells writing on his blog this morning:
What is on the mind of New Zealanders? According to the Herald on Thursday
7th June 2012, Google revealed that 'The GC', that bleak exposition of mindless
narcissism and 'Target''s exposure of a masturbating tradesman were what
obsessed Aotearoa New Zealand. This is what happens when a society has a dearth
of ideas. It turns in on itself and revels in mindlessness. A society survives
through its ideas.
A way of celebrating ideas and excellence is to give awards. New Zealand
Post sponsors the New Zealand book awards and yesterday was the public
announcement of the finalists. The Dominion Post managed to muck up the
convenor's comments that there was so much excellent nonfiction they extended
the non-fiction category to five finalists. It did however run the lists of the
finalists. The Herald produced a small item, less in size than its
reportage of the 'granny' who ran amok on an alcohol-fuelled flight to New
Zealand. It didn't list the finalists.
I am fortunate enough to be a finalist in the nonfiction category. I feel a
lot of things, but chiefly I feel thrilled. Yet I have to admit to feeling
pissed off at the pathetic coverage in the news media. I recognise that pecks
and sex, and a granny on a drunken rampage tickles the trivia bone but - hey -
remember this concept: the knowledge economy. Remember all those
editorials and op eds about how a small society like New Zealand needs
knowledge and ideas to survive? (Ironically in the biz section the Herald ran a
big article about how depressed Britain was increasingly dependant on its
knowledge economy and the arts. Gee, thanks Independent.)
What happens when a small society like ours decides to ignore or trivialise
ideas? It withers or becomes lost in bathos. Book awards should be treated
intelligently, with knowledgeable, pithy and witty diagnoses of the contenders.
After all, a book is in essence a collection of ideas, an exposition, a
celebration.
Alternatively we can all just shut up shop and join the queue at customs. Or
Google….let me see…'small minded brain dead country'….
Footnote:
Well put Peter.
2 comments:
Peter Wells, you are right on the money.
I think part of the problem is that the Awards have crept later in the year, so there's a big gap between the closing date and the Awards being announced. I bought my copy of the Trouble with Fire remaindered in W/coulls Queensgate in April!
There is to be a full review of this Awards programme according to Sam Elworthy so I am sure the organisers will look at the issue of timing as well as the vexed question of there only being 3 short listed fiction and poetry titles.
The last review didn't achieve a helluva lot so lets hope that this time those concerned go into their meeting with an open mind and pay attention to the widespread criticism of the present arrangements.
Post a Comment