Seamus Heaney, who has died aged 74, was a master of perfectly controlled and physically alive poetry, says Sameer Rahim.
In January, I heard Seamus Heaney reading at the
Tricycle Theatre in north London. At the time it felt like a special event – and
with the news that the Nobel Prize-winning poet has died aged 74, I feel even
more privileged to have been there. He read from his poem “Two Lorries” – "one
of the least romantic titles for a poem ever”, he drily noted – which opens with
a memory of his mother having coal delivered: “It’s raining on black coal and
warm wet ashes.” The last two words echoed a passage from Joyce’s Ulysses
he had read out earlier, in which Stephen Dedalus’s dead mother appears in a
dream smelling of “wetted ashes”.
Heaney's echo was surely deliberate. It felt like he was allowing us a private glimpse of his creative method.
Heaney's echo was surely deliberate. It felt like he was allowing us a private glimpse of his creative method.
As with most schoolchildren, I first studied Heaney in English classes.
We all read “Digging” and diligently analysed its central metaphor about a pen
being to a writer what a spade is to a farmer. It must have been the first time
I recognised a metaphor. We earnestly debated animal cruelty after reading “The
Early Purges”. Heaney slightly regretted that he was taught more for his message
than his language. “If I have any doubts,” he told me when I interviewed him in
2009, “it’s the trimness with which the poems are taught
sometimes.” But you could not help being drawn into his perfectly controlled and
physically alive verse. “Death of a Naturalist” was terrifying: “Right down the
dam gross-bellied frogs were cocked / On sods; their loose necks pulsed like
sails.”
Heaney’s work was not all ploughs and flax-dams. “Oysters” describes his
lusty appetite for shellfish: “Our shells clacked on the plates. / My tongue was
a filling estuary / My palate hung with starlight.” Once consumed, though, the
poet thinks about who harvested the oysters and feels guilty at this “Glut of
privilege”. The farm lad had come a long way, but he could never escape his
roots.
More
More
No comments:
Post a Comment