|
Janet Malcolm and Ileene
Smith
Authors and Editors in Conversation
|
Ileene Smith: The title essay of your recently published volume -- Forty-one
False Starts: Essays on Artists and Writers -- is an ingenious
portrait of the artist David Salle that is taught in journalism
schools. At what point did you decide to construct the piece as a
series of "false starts"?
Janet Malcolm: In most of what I write, it takes me a long
time to find the opening that will propel the piece forward. False
starts are openings that don't go anywhere. While struggling to
find the right start for my piece about David Salle, it occurred to
me that the record of the struggle might form a kind of parallel to
Salle's paintings, which are a meld of images that don't seem to go
together but in some mysterious way do. So I began writing false
false starts and added them to the rather large number of true ones
I had already written.
|
|
|
|
Festing with Bill
Loehfelm
Book Keeping Culture Diary
|
Bill Loehfelm (author of, most recently, The
Devil in Her Way) knows a thing or two about New Orleans. And music. Like
his heroine, Maureen Coughlin, Loehfelm is a New York City
transplant to New Orleans... and when he's not writing, he plays
drums in the Ibervillains, a rock and soul cover band.
It's a straight shot down Camp Street from my corner in the
Garden District to the corner of Camp and Canal Street, where Camp
becomes Chartres Street and leads into the Quarter. Riding down, I
have the same thought I always have when I ride down to the Quarter
-- why don't I do this more often? People travel a long way and
spend a lot of money to hang in the French Quarter. I'm a
twenty-minute bike ride away every day of my life. Since the storm,
I do my best not to take my city for granted. Some days I do better
than others [...]
|
|
|
|
|
"Katherine was highly skilled at bringing arguments
back to their original frame of reference, a tactic that had the
double effect of making everything she'd said seem to lead back to
some central point, meaning her entire argument was, in terms of interior
logic, bulletproof, while at the same time implying that Daniel had
forgotten what they were arguing about and so had unwittingly
constructed an argument that was untenable and made no
sense."
(From Idiopathy, by Sam
Byers)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment