Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Why we should subsidise hipster novelists' housing

Sure, there is an economic argument against subsiding housing for artists – but without them, we risk missing out on our cities' stories being captured on the page

A house listed on the auction block during a tax foreclosures auction in Detroit.
A house listed on the auction block during a tax foreclosures auction in Detroit. Photograph: Rebecca Cook/Reuters
Bankrupt and boarded up – the city of Detroit hardly sounds like an inspiring place to work on your novel. But if your rent is covered – then suddenly the prospect is a lot more appealing. Detroit non-profit organisation Write a House is renovating two three-bedroom houses and is accepting applications (worldwide) for writers to move in rent-free. If the writers stay for two years, they get the deeds to the house. I suspect the organisation won’t be short of applications.

The perennial question among most creative people I know is not what to create, but how to create: how am I going to write this book/play/polemic and also pay the rent? It’s a tricky balance. Apart from a lucky few writers who get big advances or grants, most novelists cannot live off their work. They need a second (or even third) job to keep on writing.
More

No comments:

Post a Comment